Toastmasters logo
Canada Maple LeafClub 1085

top_1

Toastmaster header

 

HIGHLIGHTS

North Shore Toastmasters     t Club Meeting

January 14th, 2008

From intriguing guests to fascinating speeches and an unconventional and highly successful Table Topics session, tonight was a meeting not to be missed! “An exceptional turnout considering the dark and blustery weather! 14 members and 6 guests!” Several members appreciated the “great theme” of “Road Trips” suggested by Jim; it provided “lots of humour throughout the evening.”

“I liked [Chairman] Jim’s instructive introduction re: to have or not to have a theme.” “Jim’s pacing was excellent.” “I enjoyed Jim’s well-made comments to open ‘our one-and- three-quarter hour road trip’.” “Our Chairman had a good intro to each person with a role; his question elicited interesting answers!” Susan, who stepped in as Wordsmith at the last minute, gave great examples of the chosen word [“peregrination”], which was one member’s highlight. “Susan, you educated us, and you made us laugh!” “I really liked Chairman Jim’s bridging, when he commented that he thought ‘peregrination’ was a bird!” Jan K. “worked her usual wizardry in her role as Wizard of Ahs.” “I liked Jan K’s examples of ‘lip tsking’.” Timer Dave A.’s “innovative use of rattling the piggy bank in the absence of a bell” received praise from several members. “Rattling the piggy bank was far less terrifying than his threat of blowing the emergency ski whistle!” Another Toastmaster was more appreciative: “I liked the Timer’s secret weapon!” Jokemaster Jill “delighted us” with a rare occurrence: personal humorous stories about her grandchildren in place of a memorized joke. “I totally relate to the possessive attitude of her three-year-old grandson: ‘Get your own T-Rex, Nana!’”

“Diane, our Table Topics Master, ran a very unique, interesting and fun session.” The “terrifyingly hilarious” Table Topics session was organized so that presenters were given a slip of paper with the question they were to address two minutes before presenting; the audience never heard the question, only the response. “Her questions took us on a road trip to Peru, camping, then with Thelma and Louise, then on a flamenco pilgrimage, on a summer trip to Thunder Bay, then on a trip organized by a ‘girl Friday’, and finally on a Greyhound bus to Ottawa. It wore me out!” “The links to the theme of peregrination were varied and endless, and the responses very revealing!” “Diane definitely had a good command of her role.”
Christina “caught the warmth and humour” present in the speeches in her Table Topics Evaluation. She was also highly praised for her “great first-time Table Topics Evaluation.” “Christina gave great individual praise, with lots of specific examples for each speaker.”

“I enjoyed the cake during the break, celebrating both Jim’s completion of his CTM #10 speech and Hilary’s wedding! Delicious!”

After the break (and cake), Karen took us “off the beaten path” and gave us some “great and humorous travel dos and don’ts”. “I loved her advice to ‘resist confessional urges’ when on a road trip. So true!” Ultimately, as Karen told us: “the road wants what the road wants.” Karen “was well-prepared for her introductions of the two speakers this evening.” Jane received high praise for her second speech, “a persuasive and inspiring speech in which she encouraged her audience to support the Biscuit Fund in the SPCA.” For a speaker who used to seem nervous at the lectern, “her poise was amazing.” “I really liked Jane’s use of clear statistics to back up her arguments; very convincing.” One member highlighted this quote from Jane’s speech: “A society which takes care of animals becomes a more humane society.” Kate gave “a positive and thorough evaluation” of Jane’s speech.
The second speaker, Li-Ying, gave an advanced speech in praise of Tony Parsons. “Her admiration for her subject really shone through” and several of us “learned quite a bit about a figure [we’ve] seen for years.” Li-Ying was praised for speaking “without any notes”, and for her “good personal expression of opinions.” Jessica, who evaluated Li-Ying’s speech, was lauded for her “very competent and insightful handling of her first-time speech evaluation.” “Jessica had some excellent pick-ups, and used specific examples in both her praise and constructive comments.”
Wing Lee’s General Evaluation “was delightfully entertaining and humorous” – “even if it was a little unconventional!” He was lauded for his “great gestures and wonderful turns of phrase.” Indeed, his evaluation was an “hysterically funny way to end a great evening!”

Member
Club News
Educational Tidbits
History [PDF]
Picture Gallery
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Home   caro  Back  caro   Top

   caro  Privacy Statement  caro  Advertising Policy caro  Webmaster caro

 
© 2004-2008 North Shore Toastmasters. All rights reserved.
West Vancouver United Church
2062 Esquimalt Avenue, West Vancouver
Revised:

www.cenex-bc.ca - Webdesign